Platform — Proposal Workspace
Structured drafting support
Proposals are generated with distinct sections — executive summary, technical narrative, budget justification, and evaluation criteria response. Each section can be reviewed, edited, and regenerated independently.
Every draft version is preserved with timestamp, change summary, and the ability to compare versions side-by-side. No work is ever lost, and the evolution of a proposal is always visible.
Assign reviewers to specific sections or the full proposal. Track review status, collect feedback, and manage the approval process before submission — all within the workspace.
Export proposals in formats suitable for submission — structured text, formatted documents, or section-by-section output that can be integrated into your existing submission workflow.
Proposal generation is not a single-click operation. It is a structured process that draws on your project context, the opportunity requirements, and the decision intelligence analysis to produce a draft that is grounded in specific, identifiable inputs.
The workspace draws on your project description, organizational profile, team qualifications, and prior work to ground the proposal in real institutional context — not generic boilerplate.
The FOA's evaluation criteria, program priorities, and submission requirements determine the section structure and emphasis of the generated draft.
The alignment analysis and fit diagnostic from the Decision Intelligence module inform how the proposal frames the project's relevance, addresses potential weaknesses, and emphasizes strengths.
Each section can be regenerated, manually edited, or refined independently. The workspace tracks which sections have been reviewed and which are still in draft state.
Organizations that submit federal proposals operate under review requirements — internal sign-off, compliance checks, budget verification, and sometimes external review. The Proposal Workspace is designed to support these processes, not bypass them.
Every generated section links back to the inputs that produced it — project context, opportunity data, and decision intelligence. Reviewers can verify what informed the draft.
Manual edits are tracked alongside generated content. The workspace distinguishes between AI-generated and human-edited content for review clarity.
The complete proposal history — versions, edits, review status, and export events — is available for institutional audit and compliance documentation.